Files
quartz-research-note/content/Beyond Productivity - Rethinking the Impact of Creativity Support Tools.md
松浦 知也 Matsuura Tomoya 21f7c7800e
All checks were successful
Build / build (push) Successful in 21m3s
[obsidian] vault backup: 2025-10-06 17:32:31[
2025-10-06 17:32:31 +09:00

2.8 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

cssclass, type, author, title, date, citekey, tags
cssclass type author title date citekey tags
research-note conferencePaper Rhys Cox, Samuel; Bøjer Djernæs, Helena; van Berkel, Niels Beyond Productivity: Rethinking the Impact of Creativity Support Tools 2025-06-22 rhys_cox_beyond_2025
research
conferencePaper

[!Cite] Rhys Cox, Samuel, Helena Bøjer DjernæsとNiels van Berkel. 2025年. 「Beyond Productivity: Rethinking the Impact of Creativity Support Tools」. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Creativity and Cognition (New York, NY, USA), C&C 25, 6月, 73549. https://doi.org/10.1145/3698061.3726924.

[!Synth] Contribution::

Related::

online local pdf

[!md] FirstAuthor:: Samuel Rhys Cox Author:: Helena Bøjer Djernæs Author:: Niels van Berkel ~
Title:: Beyond Productivity: Rethinking the Impact of Creativity Support Tools
Year:: 2025
Citekey:: rhys_cox_beyond_2025
itemType:: conferencePaper
Publisher:: Association for Computing Machinery
Location:: New York, NY, USA
Pages:: 735749
DOI:: 10.1145/3698061.3726924
ISBN:: 9798400712890

[!LINK]

Full Text PDF.

[!Abstract]

Creativity Support Tools (CSTs) are widely used across diverse creative domains, with generative AI recently increasing the abilities of CSTs. To better understand how the success of CSTs is determined in the literature, we conducted a review of outcome measures used in CST evaluations. Drawing from (n=173) CST evaluations in the ACM Digital Library, we identified the metrics commonly employed to assess user interactions with CSTs. Our findings reveal prevailing trends in current evaluation practices, while exposing underexplored measures that could broaden the scope of future research. Based on these results, we argue for a more holistic approach to evaluating CSTs, encouraging the HCI community to consider not only user experience and the quality of the generated output, but also user-centric aspects such as self-reflection and well-being as critical dimensions of assessment. We also highlight a need for validated measures specifically suited to the evaluation of generative AI in CSTs. .

Notes

.

Annotations%% begin annotations %%

%% end annotations %%

%% Import Date: 2025-10-06T16:03:04.441+09:00 %%